Archive - AI Lab Watch

The current state of RSPs

This is a reference post.

Nov 4, 2024 •

Zach Stein-Perlman

October 2024

What AI companies should do

Some rough ideas

Oct 21, 2024 •

Zach Stein-Perlman

Anthropic rewrote its RSP

Oct 16, 2024 •

Zach Stein-Perlman

September 2024

Model evals for dangerous capabilities

Testing an LM system for dangerous capabilities is crucial for assessing its risks

Sep 23, 2024 •

Zach Stein-Perlman

July 2024

June 2024

Anthropic's Certificate of Incorporation

New details on the Long-Term Benefit Trust, but most questions remain

Jun 12, 2024 •

Zach Stein-Perlman

May 2024

AI companies' commitments

May 29, 2024 •

Zach Stein-Perlman

Maybe Anthropic's Long-Term Benefit Trust is powerless

Anthropic should share the details

May 27, 2024 •

Zach Stein-Perlman

AI companies aren't really using external evaluators

But they should

May 24, 2024 •

Zach Stein-Perlman

New voluntary commitments (AI Seoul Summit)

Basically the companies commit to make responsible scaling policies. Part of me says this is amazing, the best possible commitment short of all…

May 21, 2024 •

Zach Stein-Perlman

DeepMind’s “Frontier Safety Framework” is weak and unambitious

FSF blogpost. Full document (just 6 pages; you should read it). Compare to Anthropic’s RSP, OpenAI’s RSP (“Preparedness Framework”), and METR’s Key…

May 18, 2024 •

Zach Stein-Perlman

#nojs-banner { position: fixed; bottom: 0; left: 0; padding: 16px 16px 16px 32px; width: 100%; box-sizing: border-box; background: red; color: white; font-family: -apple-system, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", "Segoe UI Symbol"; font-size: 13px; line-height: 13px; } #nojs-banner a { color: inherit; text-decoration: underline; } This site requires JavaScript to run correctly. Please turn on JavaScript or unblock scripts